Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter08.txt

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 43KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 21, 1976, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8.

As we begin to celebrate the Bicentennial of our Independence, let us
reflect for a moment on our past. Out of a vast wilderness our people
created a nation with astonishing speed. Our Forefathers brought forth
a nation with the highest and most stable form of self-government ever
conceived by man. It was unique in the entire world, a prescription
for freedom simple enough for everyone to understand, yet truly a work
of genius. It's no wonder that from our earliest days as an
independent nation the eyes of the entire world have been riveted on
the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

What was initially called our noble experiment was spectacular in its
success, and America's banner of freedom became a symbol of hope for
oppressed peoples everywhere.

Would any of this have happened without the clear patriotic vision of
our Founding Fathers? Could it have come to pass without the courage
of George Washington who in 1776 led the famous surprise attack on the
far stronger British forces in Trenton? Would we have had our inspired
and inspirational CONSTITUTION if Benjamin Franklin's call for prayer
had not broken the impasse over representation at the Constitutional
Convention in Philadelphia in 1787? Could we ever have had a
government sensitive to the wishes of the people if the humility of
our early leaders had been replaced with the arrogant boasting
practiced by our corrupt rulers of today? And, would we have had a
nation such as ours if our Founding Fathers had believed in the
internationalism promoted today by the Rockefeller Brothers?

What would our Founding Fathers say today if they could see us
meddling in the affairs of other countries? How would they feel about
the tremendous sacrifices they endured if they could see our rulers of
today building up another nation to become our slave master at our own
expense?

We would all do well to look back once again at the patriotic words of
George Washington in his Farewell Address as President. He advised his
countrymen to extend commercial relations to foreign nations with as
little political connection as possible. He did not advise against
such commercial relations in themselves, nor did he object to
temporary alliances with foreign nations when needed in an emergency;
but he did give us a clear, strong warning that has an urgent
relevance to us today, and I quote:

"to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign
world."

Is this rule being followed today by our Rockefeller Rulers and their
client followers?

Since 1917 the Rockefeller empire has been allied with the Soviet
Union, with which we are to be merged against our will and with the
Soviets ultimately in the driver's seat!! As I explained last month,
and have often discussed on other occasions, we, the people are the
victims of an alliance between State Socialism in Russia and Corporate
Socialism here under the Rockefeller Brothers. And, my friends, this
is not an informal arrangement. Since at least the early days of the
Eisenhower Administration, which was actually run behind the scenes by
Nelson Rockefeller, there has been a White House Directive which I am
about to reveal to you for the very first time. It is short, but not
sweet. It establishes as a prime goal of federal policy, and I quote
here:

"to so alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably
merged with life in the Soviet Union."

My friends, I do not merely challenge, I dare President Ford or anyone
else in the White House to deny the existence of this Directive under
oath. They won't do so unless they have become so desperate that they
are willing to gamble on any bluff, because I have access to
documentary evidence on this matter that could immediately convict
them for perjury and lead to impeachment and/or prison.

Yes, this short White House Directive, my friends, quote: "to so alter
life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with life
in the Soviet Union"--that's the key to all of our domestic and
foreign policy today. It explains why we have become the factory for
the Soviet Union. It explains why so many multinational corporations
are being used to build up the Soviet economy while depressing our
own. It explains why the many huge Rockefeller-controlled, tax-exempt
Foundations, which are all working in this direction, are immune to
prosecution for their flagrant violation of their charters. It
explains why the Rockefeller-controlled banks and financial
institutions are so single-mindedly financing the Soviet Juggernaut at
American taxpayer expense.

It is little wonder that Nobel Prize-winning biologist George Wald in
an article a year ago about the runaway power of the multinational
corporations said, and I quote: "hence no nation so closely resembles
the United States as the Soviet Union."

My fellow citizens, it is essential that we halt this horrible
slippage backward into tyranny. If we are to survive as a free people
beyond this our Bicentennial Year, we, the people, must rise up and
make the Government that belongs to us turn its face forward once
again to the still new, still fresh ideals and principles that
launched our great nation. I am absolutely convinced that we can still
do it IF WE WILL.

Last month I recorded AUDIO BOOK No. 6 entitled "WHAT WE CAN DO TO
SAVE AMERICA" to explain the strategy which I believe can and will do
the job. And already alert citizens all over America are listening to
this message, getting to work, and making suggestions. If YOU will
join in the task, we can do it. Meanwhile I intend to keep informing
you about what we are up against, how events are progressing, and what
plans are being formed behind the scenes. To this end, I want to talk
to you today about three topics that all reflect the drive to merge
life in America with that in the Soviet Union.

Topic #1--OUR CHARGES FOR A CITIZENS' INDICTMENT ON THE FORT KNOX TWIN
SCANDAL COVER-UP

Topic #2--ROCKEFELLER PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN THEIR DRIVE TO DRAG OUR
ECONOMY DOWN TO THE SOVIET LEVEL

Topic #3--SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF
GEORGE WASHINGTON

Topic #1--It is essential that I give special attention to the first
topic today, but I will deal with the remaining two topics as fully as
I can in the time that remains for them.

Almost two years ago in April 1974 during Congressional testimony
before a subcommittee of the "House Banking and Currency Committee" I
first revealed that the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox had been
looted of its gold. I stood ready to present evidence to substantiate
my charges, but nothing whatever was done! Having been failed by
Congress, I then took my story to the public through lectures, radio
Talk Shows, and publication of my charges in a national weekly
newspaper. Faced by this public pressure, the Government responded by
setting in motion a well orchestrated cover-up, a cover-up far more
massive and more serious than that of the Watergate scandal which
removed our last elected President from office.

The actual cover-up began on September 23, 1974, with the carefully
staged visit of Congressmen and newsmen to Fort Knox. I have detailed
the ensuing cover-up, among other things, in my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on
the "FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU." I have also
given you continuing updates since June 1975 by means of my monthly
AUDIO LETTER. In October 1975 I revealed what I had just learned at
that time that makes a "twin" super scandal of the Fort Knox
situation--namely, the presence of about 60 pounds of radioactive
liquid super poison processed from deadly plutonium-239 in the Central
Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox. The canisters of
poison put there in 1968 by the CIA are corroding and leaking faster
and faster, endangering the health and even the lives of millions of
Americans in the southeastern United States.

The Government's response to thissecond, far more serious half of the
Fort Knox Scandal, has been the same as to the first--COVER UP. I've
explained in recent months how first Senator Frank Church and then
Congressm an Otis Pike, Chairmen respectively of the Senate and House
Intelligence Committees, have become parties to the Fort Knox
plutonium scandal cover-up; and how bureaucratic gobbledygook is being
used by Government officials to avoid giving straight, honest answers
about the situation.

But now, the Fort Knox Scandal cover-up is getting even worse. It has
recently entered a new phase of outright lying and of masking the
evidence concerning my charges. They are going for broke, and they
have long since passed the point of no return. The same tactics of
lying and cheating by the Government that are standard practice in the
Soviet Union, into which we are to be merged, are now being used here
in the United States, and these tactics are far more effective here
than in Russia because Americans, unlike Soviet citizens, have not yet
learned to expect their government to lie to them continuously. Up
'till now the main cover-up approach has been one of evasion, but now
an atmosphere of desperation on the part of the wrongdoers is becoming
increasingly apparent. For the very first time Treasury Secretary
William Simon has made the fatal mistake of actually lying, in writing
no less, about a crucial matter--the existence of the Central Core
Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox. We have challenged the
Government to either confirm or deny its existence in the past; and we
have identified it not only by this name, "Central Core Vault", but
also by describing it to avoid any possibility of misunderstanding due
to terminology.

In a letter to a friend of mine dated December 10, 1975, Simon said
the following, and I quote:

"The allegation that plutonium 239 is, or ever has been stored at Fort
Knox in a central core vault is false, and the Army has just conducted
an extensive test of the Bullion Depository and has found no evidence
of radioactivity. I should add that there is no such thing as the
Central Core Vault."

Notice that Simon's denial of the presence of plutonium-239 at the
Depository is tied right in with his denial of the existence of the
Central Core Vault. Obviously if there is no Central Core Vault then
it cannot contain plutonium-239! But on the other hand, to have any
faith that his denial about the plutonium is truthful, you must also
believe his assertion that there exists no Central Core Vault at the
Depository. If he would lie about one, he would lie about the other.

With that in mind, please listen now to an excerpt from another
letter--this one written to one of my associates by a retired
Lieutenant General, John L. Ryan, Jr., a former Commanding General of
Fort Knox. General Ryan probably knows more about the Depository than
anyone else who ever commanded Fort Knox. He spent two tours of duty
there before he returned a third time as the Commanding General; and
when the gold was moved to Fort Knox to be stored there for the very
first time in 1937, it was he who was placed in charge of the actual
physical movement of the incoming gold into the Depository. With
regard to the disputed Central Core Vault, he says, quote:

"When I use the word 'vault' I am referring to the central core of the
Depository where the bullion was stored. This vault was below ground
level and could be entered only through a specially constructed
bank-type door that opened onto a screw lift. This door was in the
Receiving-Shipping area of the Depository. The Receiving-Shipping room
was above ground level. The vault was below ground level. Around the
vault proper, or central core, below ground level was a passageway. On
this passageway were a number of cell-like compartments. There was no
means of entering the vault from this passageway."

My friends, the passageway with its compartments are all that the
visitors saw in September 1974. The existence of the Central Core
Vault, which is where the gold, if any, should have been, is
absolutely confirmed by General Ryan; and as his letter makes clear,
the 1974 visitors had no chance of finding out about it while
wandering around in the passageway and looking at the small
compartments you heard and read about in the news.

Such bald-faced lying is bad enough, but the mounting desperation of
the Rockefeller Brothers and their lackeys over Fort Knox now goes
even beyond mere lying. It is standard practice whenever an extremely
damaging secret is in danger of exposure, to distract attention from
it and confuse the issue by deliberately exposing something
else--something far less serious and dangerous than the secret being
hidden yet shocking enough to satisfy the public's appetite for the
truth.

With our totally manipulated government of today, a good rule of thumb
is whenever something that looks really damaging is revealed, ask
yourself: "Why are they letting this out of the bag? What is it that
is worse that they are trying to distract my attention from?" Thus,
for example, Sen. Church's sensational revelations last summer about
deadly shellfish toxins and the like fooled many into believing they
had been given the whole ugly truth about CIA misdeeds, but actually
he was covering up what he knew about the insane nuclear super poison
at Fort Knox--something a thousand times worse than anything he
revealed.

Now in the same way a cover-up campaign has been launched in regard to
the leakage of the plutonium-239 super poison from Fort Knox, and it's
horrible. A few days ago on January 12, 1976, a truck carrying
radioactive waste just "happened" to have an accident in eastern
Kentucky, smack in the heart of the area now most heavily affected by
radioactive poison leakage from Fort Knox. Fourteen of the 32 drums of
waste on the truck fell off, and 8 of them broke open and leaked. The
newspaper stories around there about it contained the usual assurances
that there was no danger, that it had been cleaned up, etc., but
leakage had occurred.

Just six days later on January 18 newspapers contained big articles
about still another alleged radioactive waste leakage problem in
Kentucky.

The truck I mentioned a moment ago had been on its way to a nuclear
waste dumping ground at Maxey Flats, Kentucky, which had been in use
since 1963, and now we are suddenly told that the leakage is occurring
there too. Federal investigators, those wonderful watchdogs we are
supposed to trust and admire, claimed that radioactive waste in steel,
wooden, and even cardboard drums has been just dropped into trenches
and covered up with dirt; and after 12 years they have just now
abruptly discovered that some of it has gotten loose and is spreading
through the ground, through the water, and through the air. And a
study by the General Accounting Office, while it gives the standard
assurance that there is no immediate danger, recommends a crash
program to correct the situation and develop systematic standards for
safe disposal of radioactive waste.

Now, why all of this sudden concern about leakage of radioactive
contamination? And why does the spotlight on actual leakage cases just
happen to be on Kentucky? After all, there are vastly more serious
problems of this sort elsewhere in the United States, for example, in
New York State--but so why Kentucky? Two reasons, my friends. For one
thing, they are using the opportunity to continue the nuclear "con
game" that has been pulled on you for years by assuring you even when
there are nuclear waste leakages that you don't really have to worry
about it. But, more importantly, in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 7 last
month I posed a direct challenge to the federal government to either
prove or disprove my charges; and I spelled out a fair, objective way
to do it. What is going on now is their answer to my challenge by
spreading stories about other kinds of radioactive waste leakage in
the general vicinity of Fort Knox, and possibly by deliberately
causing such releases--such as occurred in the truck accident--they
are feverishly tampering with the evidence.

The program I suggested to use offsite measurements to detect leakage
from the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox would, as they can now argue,
no longer prove anything conclusively about my charges because of
these other radioactive leakages which alleg edly have also suddenly
been discovered in the same region. I, for one, would like to see the
whole business about Fort Knox laid to rest once and for all, and I
know you would too. I know that my charges about the gold and about
the plutonium poison are true; but for the sake of argument IF I were
wrong, I would rather be honestly proven wrong about any or all of
them and be made a laughingstock than to have the American people's
worry over this matter dragged out endlessly like this.

Whatever the truth is, I want you to know; but the Rockefeller lackeys
in the Government know only too well that the truth is exactly what I
have told you, and they don't want you to know. They will do anything
and everything to try to save themselves regardless of how many other
human beings they may doom in the process. And so, my friends, this is
the vicious reality behind the smooth mask that our
Rockefeller-controlled federal government wears. We, the people, must
bring the pressure to bear that will cause these things to be honestly
investigated and corrected.

The United States is under the thumb of modern outlaws; and if we do
not bring them to justice, they will bring us and our children to
total ruin. So far the United States Congress has not seen fit even to
consider my charges about the gold, about the plutonium, about
anything! The problem is not that I don't have the evidence, but that
I have too much of it. The same applies to the Justice Department, the
General Accounting Office, the White House, and so on, so on.

But recently a Congressman who heard my testimony in Congress about
the missing Fort Knox gold in April 1974 and who went to Fort Knox in
September 1974, gave us a tiny opening, whether wittingly or
unwittingly. His constituents have been pressing him continuously for
some answers about Fort Knox; and in recent replies which were
forwarded to me, he in effect challenged us to do exactly what we have
wanted to do for nearly two years--to present our charges and evidence
in a proper legal forum. Our response is a six-page "Open Letter" by
my able co-patriot, Mr. Edward Durell of Berryville, Virginia. The
letter is addressed to Congressman John B. Conlan of Arizona--but it
is open, because based on past performance we have little reason for
optimism that he will take any constructive action unless he is forced
to do so by public pressure.

The letter presents charges which parallel completely, even in legal
form, the impeachment charges leveled at President Nixon by the House
of Representatives. It is a legal document, and YOU are the
nation-wide Grand Jury. Under our CONSTITUTION, it is ultimately we,
the people, who constitute the highest human authority in our land,
and it is UP TO YOU to decide. Do our charges deserve an open,
complete, honest investigation in a proper legal forum or not? If so,
it is UP TO YOU to return a "Citizens Indictment" by demanding that
your elected representatives provide a legal forum through
Congressional investigation or formal Grand Jury proceedings.

Here now is Mr. Durell's letter to Congressman Conlan of Arizona. I
will be quoting from the letter from here on all the way to Mr.
Durell's signature. Mr. Durell's letter is dated January 7, 1976:

"Dear Mr. Conlan,

Your letters of December 5, 1975, to Mrs. Mary Barrow and Mr. Art
Bentley both of Lake Havasu City, Arizona, have been sent to me for
comment. To that end I write direct to you, with copies to them and
other interested parties.

In your letter to Mrs. Barrow you state among other things that,
quote: 'Grand Juries are empaneled to investigate criminal
wrongdoing', and that if, quote: 'you personally have evidence of
crimes committed in connection with our nation's gold holdings, please
let me know so that I can put you directly in touch with appropriate
officials of the United States Justice Department who would have
jurisdiction in this matter.'

In your letter to Mr. Bentley you state among other things that while
you have, quote: 'some misgivings' about the gold situation, quote: 'I
can assure you that exposure to any radioactive poison would have
caused me serious illness. Neither I nor anyone else who went to Fort
Knox has suffered any such illness.'

Please allow us firstly to answer your letter to Mr. Bentley. It is
common knowledge in nuclear medicine that if one is exposed to alpha
particle radiation of plutonium, death due to cancer can come in a
matter of months or years. It all depends upon dosage level and
duration of exposure. In this respect we would suggest that you
contact Dr. John Gofman, former professor of Medical Physics emeritus,
University of California at Berkeley; or listen to him by way of a
one-hour tape cassette obtainable from AUDIO BOOKS, INC., P. O. Box
16428, Fort Worth, Texas, 76133; special tape No. 2 for $6.00
postpaid.

(Editor's note--1981 address is:

The Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER Suite 5092, 1629 K Street, N.W. Washington,
D.C. 20006.

Current price is: $7.50 postpaid.)

In this tape Dr. Gofman speaks on the effects of radioactive poison,
among other things.

In addition, over 18% increase in cancer deaths in the first seven (7)
months this year over last year has taken place in the central-eastern
states, which has left medical authorities in the dark as to the
cause. They felt they had made such tremendous cancer advancements in
the last few years, and then to have such a high upsurge in the first
seven months this year over last year in that area alone, is baffling.

One more thing about this radioactive poison in the United States
Bullion Depository at Fort Knox--hereinafter called 'Fort Knox.' We
know from sources in the Intelligence industry that this plutonium
poison was part of the plutonium-239 stolen by members of the
Intelligence community in 1966 and that this most deadly substance was
processed in four plants--two in Kentucky, one in North Dakota, and
one in California--into radioactive liquid poison. It was then
taken--60 pounds each--to Peru, Panama, Bolivia, and Argentina under
cover of a multinational cement corporation by a CIA officer, Harold
Leroy White, for the sole purpose of threatening to contaminate the
United States-planned and built water aqueduct systems in those
countries for political and economic pressure. Sixty pounds, however,
intended for use in Argentina, was brought back by Mr. White and
placed in the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox where it has been stored
ever since late 1968. The casks are now corroding, causing leakage and
contamination over the entire areas east and southeast of Kentucky,
and as far away as Cuba. This contamination is endangering the lives
of over 40-million people in this country. Can we afford to allow
these people to be expendable?

The federal government has now publicly admitted our charges that
opium and morphine--150,000 pounds and 24,000 pounds respectively-are
stored at Fort Knox. Why will it not admit the existence of the
plutonium?

It is suggested that to do so might subject the Government to
thousands of legal actions involving hundreds of millions of dollars
under the Federal Tort Claims Act and/or the Price Anderson Act, the
1954 Atomic Energy Act as amended, Title 42 Section 2011 and following
for, quote: 'extraordinary nuclear occurrence'--that is, quote: 'any
event causing a discharge or dispersal of source, special nuclear or
by-product material from its intended place of confinement in amounts
off site or causing radiation levels off site and which has resulted
or will probably result in substantial damages to persons off site or
property off site.'

And why will it not admit the loss of our gold reserves? For the same
reasons--legal actions including those criminal in nature. And in the
latter connection, we would like here to pursue your suggestion to
Mrs. Barrow and list the charges of the high crimes committed relative
to disappearance of the people's gold reserves.

On behalf of the American people it is herein charged that the United
States Treasury Department--hereinafter called 'Treasury'--in
violation of its Constitutional duty to protect the people's gold and
in violation of its Constitutional duty to take care tha t the laws
relative to the safeguarding and custody of said gold be faithfully
executed, has failed so to do in that between January 1, 1961, and
January 1, 1974, prior and subsequent thereto, Treasury engaged itself
through its officers/agents and in concert with others in America's
corridors of financial power in a course of conduct or plan designed
to convert unto themselves the people's gold entrusted to it for
safekeeping for the avowed purpose of profiting unjust enrichment; and
in a course of conduct or plan designed to cover up, conceal and
protect those responsible and to conceal the existence and scope of
other unlawful covert activities.

The means used to implement this conduct or plan have included one or
more of the following:

1. Treasury has failed to render a true account of the amount of gold
shipped out from the United States Bullion Depositories from 1961 to
1968 under color of the 'London Gold Pool Agreement';

2. Treasury has failed to reveal the true prices, if any, received for
the sale of said gold or reveal the names of the ultimate purchasers
of said gold;

3. Treasury has failed to give a true account of the amount of gold
shipped out of the United States Bullion Depositories from 1968 to
1974 under color of an ad hoc committee composed of the Chairman of
the Federal Reserve Board, the Chairman of the Council of Economic
Advisers, the Chairman of the White House Council on International
Economic Policy, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of
Treasury, among others;

4. Treasury has issued a statement dated August 31, 1974, purporting
to list 24-million ounces of good delivery gold at Fort Knox when in
actual fact the Secretary of the Treasury admitted December 3, 1974,
that such listing is false or misleading;

5. Treasury has taken, December 9, 1974, without lawful authority,
two-million ounces of gold from the Exchange Stabilization Fund by a
simple bookkeeping device and four days later announced by way of the
General Services Administration that there would be an auction of
two-million ounces of gold on an 'as is' basis January 6, 1975. In
addition, a Dutch auction was held June 30, 1975, with the remainder
of said gold based on a price not considered best for the taxpayers of
America;

6. Treasury has caused a statement to be issued April 11, 1975, which
is false or misleading in that it purports to list all of the gold
shipments out of Fort Knox when in actual fact such list omitted among
other things a shipment of gold consisting of four (4) tractor-trailer
loads on January 20, 1965, which shipment consisted of 1.762-million
ounces valued over sixty-one million dollars ($61,000,000) at $35.00
per troy ounce--the par value for official gold at that time;

7. Treasury has in its immediate possession and control the necessary
keys, combination numbers, and time-control data for the vaults,
depositories, and their mechanisms. It thus has the highest duty to
take care that its trust be faithfully executed, but it has acted in a
manner contrary to its trust and subversive of responsible government
to the great prejudice and to the manifest injury of the people of the
United States by acting in concert with others to aid and abet, to
surreptitiously remove the gold under the cover of legal right;

8. Treasury has made false or misleading statements for the purpose of
deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a
thorough and complete inspection and audit have been conducted with
respect to allegations that Fort Knox contains no significant amounts
of gold and not accounted for, in that an inspection trip to Fort Knox
September 23, 1974, revealed one (1) cell-like compartment, No. 33, to
contain only copper-hued bars. Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the
Mint, Treasury, said, quote: 'It's all here.' Her statement is
analogous to the so-called Audit of October 1974 of only three (3) of
the cell-like compartments at Fort Knox, which Audit calls the Report
to be submitted to Congress February 10, 1975--also based on a belief
that, quote: 'It's all here.'

Further, the inference given by the inspection trip and the Audit was
that the gold at Fort Knox was of good delivery form and the remaining
ten (10) cell-like compartments were full of good delivery gold;

9. Treasury is withholding relevant and material evidence or
information from the American people in total disregard or violation
of the Constitutional right of the people to know what has happened to
its gold reserves and to its right of freedom of information for
purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or
any other lawful functions of Treasury in that the Central Core Vault
at Fort Knox was concealed from the inspection group of over 100 news
media people, six (6) Representatives, and one (1) Senator of the
United States Congress;

10. Treasury has unlawfully utilized its authority to cause the
General Accounting Office to fail to take care that the laws be
faithfully executed in that the General Accounting Office, a
legislative entity, was forced to have only two (2) of its own people
on a settlement committee to audit the alleged gold at Fort Knox,
whereas Treasury had thirteen (13) of its own people on said
committee;

11. Treasury has not caused to be made an annual physical inventory of
the people's gold since 1953. Thus Treasury has failed to take care
that Title 31 USC be faithfully executed by failing to make the
required annual physical inventories.

In all of this and more, Treasury has acted in a manner contrary to
its trust and subversive of Constitutional government to the great
prejudice of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people
of the United States; wherefore, Treasury through its officers, agents
and others in concert with it, by such conduct or plan, warrant such
parties be brought before appropriate legal authorities to answer
these charges; and, further, for the restitution of the people's gold
except that portion which is contaminated by radioactive poison in
which case said parties shall be ordered to pay the current market
gold price and for such other appropriate action as may be deemed just
and proper in the premises.

In support of the charges, please be informed that former Congressman
Frank Chelf's AFFIDAVIT dated April 7, 1975, in which he deposes and
says among other things, and I quote: 'that the United States
government was moving quietly as a church mouse out of Fort Knox' and
that the gold was, quote: 'constantly and surreptitiously on the
move.'

Fort Knox is located in former Congressman Chelf's Congressional
District. He further deposes and says that, quote: 'In response to my
previous requests for gold removal information, Treasury officials had
been courteous and most friendly but always non-committal or evasive.'
Mr. Chelf had earlier made the same charges on the floor of the House
of Representatives, but to no avail. (See Congressional Record page
15522 - August 21, 1963.)

Further, Lt. General John L. Ryan, Jr., US Army (Ret.), in his
statement of September 26, 1975 before Congressman Otis G. Pike in his
office, has proved the existence of the Central Core Vault and in fact
has drawn sketches of it. In view of this, there is no valid reason
for the Secretary of Treasury to continue to deny the existence of the
Central Core Vault at Fort Knox unless there is something deeply
secret stored therein. There admittedly may have been the necessity
for some secrecy in the 1960's when all of the gold at Fort Knox was
stored in the Central Core Vault. Why the secrecy now, since the
Comptroller General has stated on February 10, 1975, quote: 'As of
June 30, 1974 about 55% of the gold claimed by the Treasury was stored
in thirteen (13) sealed compartments at the United States Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox, Kentucky'?

As further evidence, we call your attention to the balance sheets of
the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, which carry Gold Certificate accounts as
an asset to reflect astated amount of gold which, in turn, is
reflected as a liability on Treasury balance sheets; however it is
submitted these Gold Certificate accounts reflect assets--gold--which
do not in fact exist in Treasury vaults. This same situation prevailed
in 1943 relative to silver when, quote: '14,000 tons of silver from
the Treasury reserve backing American paper money was secretly taken
from Treasury vaults although carried publicly on the Treasury balance
sheets', cited in "Tragedy and Hope" by Professor Carroll Quigley,
page 855, 1966/1974.

We could go on, but suffice it to say that Treasury during our 18
months investigations has not moved to refute by evidence the basic
charges outlined above. Meanwhile our economy is suffering by those
twin disasters, inflation and deflation--high prices with high
unemployment--initially caused by the disposing of our gold reserves
in secret and its attendant game plan.

Mr. C. Gordon Tether in his December 11, 1975, article, quote: 'A NEW
TWIST OF FORT KNOX SAGA' in the Financial Times of London stated,
quote:

'But whatever the cost in terms of loss of face, might not the United
States authorities be well advised to do whatever is necessary to
demonstrate that there is no Fort Knox cover-up? In the light of what
has happened in the United States during the past few years, deeds
inevitably now speak louder than words; and the refusal to prove that
they have nothing to hide, is inevitably destined to go on fostering
precisely the opposite impression.'

Considering all of the above, would you please be so kind as to put
the undersigned and Dr. Peter Beter, as you offered to do for Mrs.
Barrow, quote: 'directly in touch with appropriate officials of the
United States Justice Department who would have jurisdiction in this
matter'? I am authorized to state that Dr. Beter concurs with the
contents of this letter and is fully prepared to give further evidence
before a United States Grand Jury and any Congressional investigating
committee in confirmation of the charges herein cited, among others.

Further, I would suggest you personally bring this letter to the
attention of the Chairman of the House Banking Committee of which you
are a member, for appropriate action. Failure on your part to do so
will lend credence to the fact you, yourself, have become part and
parcel of the cover-up on this vital matter; and failure on the part
of the Chairman of said Committee to take such action will further
lend credence to the fact that he himself is in league with those
underlying forces at work in America's corridors of financial power.

Most respectfully, EDWARD DURELL."

Topic #2--In my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on "THE FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND
WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU", I warned you to watch for the Stock Market
crash signal, meaning general unemployment in the range of 20 to 25%.
This was originally targeted by the Rockefeller Brothers for the fall
of 1975, but their schedules have been increasingly upset by their
preoccupation with the Fort Knox Scandal "cover-up" and by the
anti-CIA actions of Indira Gandhi last summer. Even so, they are
working frantically to get the pieces of their plan together again.

Here in America, the Government officially says that unemployment in
November 1975 was 8.3%; but my own confidential information, direct
from sources within the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is that the true
figure for November was over 15%--and still increasing! Therefore the
real unemployment levels are now moving closer and closer to the Stock
Market crash signal levels I revealed nearly a year ago.

Meanwhile the Dow Jones averages lately are streaking upward
artificially in a dream world of their own, totally divorced from
reality. The stage is being set for a dramatic visible plunge downward
if the Rockefeller Brothers cut the cable on the Stock Market
elevator.

And New York City, supposedly safe from outright bankruptcy by federal
loans, is already far behind in its schedule for raising funds to stay
afloat under that loan program. At the same time, the Nation's banks
are again the subject of widespread concern, and no wonder. Recently
front page stories have deliberately been planted in major
Rockefeller-controlled newspapers about the alleged shakiness of the
mammoth Chase Manhattan Bank and in even larger First National City
Bank of New York, both of them Rockefeller controlled. This is partly
an attempt to lower the Rockefeller profile by saying: "See, we have
problems too." But more importantly, it is a deliberate effort to
undermine confidence in our whole banking system. Banks and their
customers should therefore watch for trouble. A publication which is
doing an outstanding job of keeping on top of the banking situation as
well as many other matters is the Daily News Digest, Box 27496,
Phoenix, Ariz. 85061

This month's meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Jamaica
produced no communique, no general agreement, only reflecting
continued confusion there.

Pressed by the smoldering Fort Knox Scandal on one hand and the
imminent war in the Middle East on the other, the primary goal of the
Rockefeller Brothers has now shifted to just one thing--to abolish the
official price of gold in America so that the non-existent American
gold hoard can be quietly dropped from Treasury and Federal Reserve
balance sheets. Most of the IMF gold is beyond their grasp for the
time being.

SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF GEORGE
WASHINGTON

Topic #3

Last summer Indira Gandhi cracked down on the CIA to stop the
Rockefeller take-over of her country, India. Existing war preparations
were immediately diverted to a new direction, and since that time a
major new Asian war has been brewing. In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6
two months ago, I spelled out the basic strategy for this war,
including the role to be played by the Middle East conflict in paving
the way for the Asian War. Plans are proceeding rapidly.

A few days ago Japanese Prime Minister Miki fell into a Soviet trap.
Reacting to brusk and uncooperative Soviet treatment, he announced
that Japan will sign a treaty with Red China that includes the
anti-Soviet hegemony clause desired by China. At the same time, as you
may have noticed in news reports, American business men are rapidly
packing up and leaving Japan, supposedly because their Japanese
understudies are now ready to manage things themselves--but actually
because the Rockefeller Brother interests are bailing out in advance
of war, just as happened a few months ago in Lebanon.

To set the stage for the big Asian War, hostilities are first to break
out in the Middle East to provide an excuse for a limited American
nuclear strike to cap off Arab OPEC oil wells. This will result in
cementing the Sino-Japanese alliance for war, neutralizing Europe and
producing real suffering there, and causing gas rationing in a major
body blow to our wobbly economy here in the United States.

The terrorist attack on OPEC oil ministers in Vienna last month,
engineered by our own CIA, was supposed to get the ball rolling in all
of this. Two key oil ministers were supposed to be killed, leading to
escalating reprisals and war--but the job was botched. For bungling
this top priority operation, the man in charge, Richard Welch, the CIA
station chief in Athens, was judged unreliable and executed by the CIA
itself.

And now Lebanon, which was primarily a distraction earlier, has now
become the new springboard by which the broader Middle East conflict
is to be enlarged. All of this, my friends, is part and parcel of
so-called "detente" with Soviet Russia on the way to a world
collectivist dictatorship. Rockefeller Brothers internationalism,
which is always portrayed by them as the path to peace, is actually a
prescription for war, destruction, and enslavement. To them it is
"progress."

On December 31, 1975, President Ford said on the eve of our
Bicentennial Year, and I quote: "Liberty is the most precious
possession of our past." But, fellow citizens, it is up to us to
restore liberty to our future as well. Had we simply been heeding
George Washington's wise warning to avoid permanent foreign alliances,
the horrors I have been discussing would not exist. In his Farewell
Address, he also left us with many other equally wise observations
that have direct application today. Washington's words and e xample
helped launch the greatest nation on earth, and they can help get it
moving forward again IF WE WILL ALLOW THEM TO. In this, our
Bicentennial Year, I plan to return frequently to the forward-looking
sage advice left to us by our great first President.

Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each
and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])